@inproceedings{Brust2019VSS,
    type = {inproceedings},
    key = {Brust2019VSS},
    title = {Not just a Matter of Semantics: The Relationship between Visual Similarity and Semantic Similarity},
    author = {Clemens-Alexander Brust and Joachim Denzler},
    booktitle = {DAGM German Conference on Pattern Recognition (DAGM-GCPR)},
    year = {2019},
    pages = {414-427},
    publisher = {Springer},
    series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
    volume = {11824},
    abstract = {Knowledge transfer, zero-shot learning and semantic image retrieval are methods that aim at improving accuracy by utilizing semantic information, e.g., from WordNet. It is assumed that this information can augment or replace missing visual data in the form of labeled training images because semantic similarity correlates with visual similarity. This assumption may seem trivial, but is crucial for the application of such semantic methods. Any violation can cause mispredictions. Thus, it is important to examine the visual-semantic relationship for a certain target problem. In this paper, we use five different semantic and visual similarity measures each to thoroughly analyze the relationship without relying too much on any single definition. We postulate and verify three highly consequential hypotheses on the relationship. Our results show that it indeed exists and that WordNet semantic similarity carries more information about visual similarity than just the knowledge of �different classes look different�. They suggest that classification is not the ideal application for semantic methods and that wrong semantic information is much worse than none.},
    doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-33676-9_29},
}